RSC REPORT REVIEW FORM

REPORT DETAILS:

DATE : To be filled
COMPANY NAME : To be filled
PROJECT : To be filled
REPORT CODE : To be filled
REPORT TYPE : To be filled
CP/QP : To be filled
Thank you for taking the time to review this report!

Please give each component of the report a rating from 1-5 as follow:

5 = very good
4 = good
3 = average
2 = poor
1 = very poor
n/a = not applicable

Any feature you do not wish to review please leave blank.

REVIEW:

Sampling 1 2 3 4 5 n/a
Sampling Techniques:
Drilling Techniques:
Sample Recovery:
Logging:
Sample Preparation:
Assay Data Quality:
Sampling Verifiction:
Location Accuracy:
Data Spacing:
Sample Orientation:
Sample Security:
Audits/Reviews:
Exploration Results 1 2 3 4 5 n/a
Tenement Status:
Work By Previous Owners:
Geological Description:
Drilling Information:
Data Aggregation:
Mineralistaion Orientation:
Diagrams:
Balanced Reporting:
Other Data:
Further Work:
OVERALL REPORT 1 2 3 4 5 n/a
Transparency:
Materiality:
Methodology:
Competence:
Code-Compliance:
OVERALL RATING:
Mineral Resources 1 2 3 4 5 n/a
Database Integrity:
Site Visits:
Geological Interpretation:
Dimensions:
Modelling Techniques:
Moisture Allowance:
Cut-Off Parameters:
Mining Assumptions:
Metallurgical Assumptions:
Environmental Assumptions:
Bulk Density:
Resource Classification:
Discussion of Confidence:
Ore Reserves 1 2 3 4 5 n/a
Resource Conversion:
Site Visits:
Study Status:
Cut-Off Parameters:
Mining Assumptions:
Metallurgical Assumptions:
Environmental Studies:
Infrastructure:
Cost Assessment:
Revenue Factors:
Market Assessment:
Economic Analysis:
Social Analysis:
Other Impacts:
Classifications:
Audits/Reviews:
Discussion of Confidence: